Blog1:Dealing with burnouts at Law Firm
- Yaju Shukla
- Nov 22, 2022
- 6 min read
Updated: Nov 27, 2022
T

oDuring what ended up being the final year of my legal career, I burned out. I've been researching burnout for more than ten years, and for many of those years, I've had one-on-one coaching conversations, participated in training and workshops, conducted interviews, and conducted my research. Before the pandemic, burnout was a concern, but COVID-19 has rekindled interest in the subject. To handle burnout in a meaningful and deliberate manner, my goal in writing this post is to define it and identify its causes.
Basics of burnout
Chronic fatigue, cynicism, and inefficacy—a sense of diminished impact—are the symptoms of burnout. Although the terms "burnout" and "general stress" are not interchangeable, individuals frequently do so to express a wide variety of stressors. There are many additional stress-related feelings and emotions in the middle, including irritation, overwhelm, ineffectiveness, tiredness, overextended, and languishing. Stress exists on a continuum, with thriving on one side and burnout on the other (a sense of stagnation and just muddling through). To prevent burnout from becoming the all-purpose description of your feelings and being misused, it's critical to utilize the appropriate terminology.
Other fundamentals to remember regarding burnout include:
● It's essential to quantify and discuss burnout honestly. The Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) was used to quantify burnout, and it was widely believed that being burned out meant having high weariness scores as well as either high cynicism scores or poor personal efficacy scores. Although there are other scientifically supported burnout measures, only the MBI and its various variants measure all three aspects of burnout. The researchers that created the MBI have published updated advice to help practitioners understand the many profiles that can be produced by MBI scores.
● Workplace burnout is a problem. The World Health Organization's new definition of the term, which makes it clear that "burnout relates solely to occurrences in the professional context and should not be applied to describe experiences in other areas of life," states that it is the manifestation of ongoing job stress. Burnout shouldn't be classified as an emotional ailment or described in medical terms because it is an individual manifestation of a workplace culture or systemic problem.
● Burnout is complicated. People oversimplify burnout when they concentrate on one of its major components, tiredness, and recommend self-help solutions like getting more sleep, using time management strategies, or exercising as temporary fixes.
What is known about lawyer burnout?
In terms of quantifying and further researching burnout rates, the medical profession is considerably ahead of the legal profession. While the most recent study now shows that more than 50% of physicians experience one or more burnout symptoms, I have only been able to find a small number of studies and one law journal article that discuss burnout in the legal profession. For instance, according to one study, nearly 40% of Wisconsin's public defenders fulfill the criteria for burnout, and another, more than 30 years old, indicated that burned-out attorneys are less devoted to their organizations and report less identification with their objectives.
I have been researching burnout rates and causes in various legal teams to begin to close this research gap. The MBI and/or the Areas of Worklife Survey (AWLS), an evaluation that assesses the particular reasons for burnout, have been completed by 124 of the lawyers I have worked with.
For certain teams, the average burnout rate is around 28%; other teams scored in the moderate range for both weariness and cynicism, while one team was just a few points shy of the high category for both. I believe that articles citing burnout scores of 75% or greater are likely catching several types of stress in addition to burnout. High burnout rates are uncommon when technologies with empirical validation are utilized.
Many lawyers report having very high professional efficacy scores, which indicates that they typically believe they are having an impact, moving things forward, and being proficient at what they do.
The workload is by far the biggest cause of burnout in the teams I've worked with out of the core six reasons for burnout outlined below. The workload conundrum is challenging to solve because it involves a lack of staff, many meetings, a lack of resources, unknown resources that are not being used, excessive email, inadequate teaming, and other factors.
Lack of recognition, in my experience, is another major factor. When I work with lawyers after my workshops, they tell me that things like not receiving enough thanks, not being acknowledged for going above and beyond, being denied a seat at important meetings, and performing at a level below one's title all contribute to exhaustion and cynicism.
The amount of "undecided" responses to AWLS questions about favoritism and recognition startled me. People on your team shouldn't have any doubts regarding things like if favoritism affects how choices are made at work.
Engagement and burnout can coexist. While doing research for my book, I came across a paper that explained this intriguing intersection, and since then, I have seen the same discovery elsewhere and in my work. For instance, a recent workload and hours study of attorneys conducted by Bloomberg Law revealed that 29% of participants claimed they were now burnt out despite yet indicating a satisfaction rating of 7 or higher. The corporate teams I work with frequently report high rates of burnout while also receiving excellent results on assessments of organizational engagement.
What are Some Burnout Prevention Measures for Legal Organizations?
Legal organizations must address the causes of burnout to reduce it (and apply systemic remedies). Burnout results from an imbalance between job demands (aspects of your work that require consistent effort and energy) and job resources (aspects of your work that are motivating and energy-giving). There are six core job demands that legal organizations, leaders, and teams need to address to reduce the risk of burnout
inadequate autonomy (having some choice as to how and when you perform the tasks related to your work)
high workload and stress at work (particularly problematic in combination with too few resources)
Lack of backing from the leader or colleagues (not feeling a sense of belonging at work)
Unfairness (favoritism; arbitrary decision-making) (favoritism; arbitrary decision-making)
The disconnect between values (your priorities at work don't match your surroundings)
Lack of acknowledgment (no feedback; you rarely, if ever, hear thank you)
Yoga, meditation, or wellness applications won't be able to solve these organizational problems. Three of these job requirements—workload, having little autonomy, and a lack of support from leaders or coworkers—are among the top 10 workplace problems that affect your health and lifespan.
Significant pressures are occurring at all levels of the pro
fession, even though other reasons for burnout in the legal profession may differ. On a broad scale, the legal profession is becoming more sophisticated and expanding at a never-before-seen rate for many companies and corporate legal departments. The lawyers I work with discuss how low autonomy, a lack of mentoring or support, not being thanked for their efforts, not knowing what is expected of them at different levels of practice (a sentiment I hear from both partners and associates), the "always on" 24/7 pace, the general unpredictability of the workload, loneliness, and a host of pandemic-related issues drive stress and burnout.
Additionally, practically every interaction I have with lawyers includes some discussion of culture, specifically how they believe culture either hinders or promotes well-being. Many of these requirements fall under one of the aforementioned "basic six."
Although changing the dialogue about burnout may seem like a difficult task, creating a positive culture in the legal profession begins with each team, continuously doing "TNTs" (little noticeable things). Importantly, leaders must set an example for and encourage these practices. Here are 10 TNTs that, in my experience, can help create the kinds of supportive environments needed to prevent burnout (and more directly address the job demands described above) for very little or no cost and very little time:
● Say thank you more often than you now do (probably a lot more often).
● Give direct reports and peers timely feedback
● When assigning tasks, be clear to reduce overlapping requests and uncertainty (two known accelerants of burnout)
● Make a two-way conversation centered on learning out of constructive criticism.
● Inform the public of changes
● Keep a record of your accomplishments, and be sure to share them.
● Check-in with teammates and coworkers
● Give a justification or justification for your projects, objectives, and overarching vision.
● Clarify any unclear or omitted details about the roles and tasks.
● Putting "you matter" signs first, such as addressing someone by name, making eye contact, and paying attention to coworkers
It's time to redefine burnout as a systemic problem that requires a collective effort to solve rather than as a personal problem that can be quickly resolved through self-help techniques. Burnout is a significant issue, and to address its root causes, we must begin discussing it appropriately and develop effective solutions.

Comments